宇隆-天文滤镜 发表于 2016-2-16 17:17

匈牙利天文摄影师Lóránd Fényes评测Optolong 窄带HO滤镜

本帖最后由 宇隆-天文滤镜 于 2016-2-16 17:19 编辑

匈牙利著名的天文摄影师Lóránd Fényes,长期担任匈牙利天文协会的讲师,作品发表在杂志和APOD上,获得各种国际奖项,给天文望远镜以及配件厂商提供产品测试,并且开设天文培训课:天文图片处理,拍摄,构图等等,网站每月点击量上千。这次Optolong的新款SHO 6.5/7nm窄带滤镜也由他来测试,并且提供了直观的对比图,得到了Lóránd Fényes的认可。
参数:Observation point: Hungary, Piliscsev
Date: 11.02.2016
Seeing: 6/10
Transparency: 7/10
Sky quality: faint light pollution from south (Budapest, capital of Hungary is 30 kms away)
Expositions: 10 min each
Telescope: SkyWatcher Esprit 100/550
Mount: SkyWatcher AZ-EQ6 GT
CCD: QHY IC8300
Reductor: Riccardi Reducer 0.75x
Filters
Baader Ha 7nm 36mm
Baader OIII 8.5nm 36mm
Optolong Ha 7nm 36mm
Optolong OIII 6.5nm 36mm
Guiding: QHY5L-II

Baader H-alpha Narrowband 7nm vs Optolong H-Alpha 7nm


Quick summaryI made the same processing steps for the fair comparison: dark, flat, flatdark. Grey box: exactly the same area, same luminance values (C: 73%, M: 67%, Y: 65%, K: 80).The signal-to-noise ratio of Baader HA filter measures lower contrast. The halo around the bright stars seems to be much more softer when using Optolong filter. I placed the more reflective side of the filters point away from the chip (on Baader filters the V marks the preferred orientation). Of course it is not a general rule and it is not only because of the filters. It depends on every system, for example in an optical system that put a lens or series of lenses close in front of the filter it can cause reflections. I have reflexions with Baader and Optolong too but the difference is visible.

Baader OIII Narrowband 8.5nm vs Optolong H-Alpha 6.5nm

Quick summary:I made the same processing steps for the fair comparison: dark, flat, flatdark. Grey box: exactly the same area, same luminance values (C: 73%, M: 67%, Y: 65%, K: 80).I had hard time with bader OIII since it results a rather uneven picture. It can be a major problem when dealing with very faint objects (there is a strong need to use the “curve” command). So even with the finest pics it requires lots of post-processing.On the other hand the Optolong filter shows better contrast. Since it does result a very even background it is easy to process images

Lóránd Fényes的其他作品以及网站链接:
http://fenyeslorand.hu/optolong-vs-baader/





老AK 发表于 2016-2-16 17:23

哇塞,大片

morning 发表于 2016-2-16 17:24

{:2_197:}

宇隆-天文滤镜 发表于 2016-2-16 17:55

morning 发表于 2016-2-16 17:24


新年好!
期待更多的作品和经验分享!

宇隆-天文滤镜 发表于 2016-2-16 17:56

老AK 发表于 2016-2-16 17:23
哇塞,大片

{:2_187:}

jxsky 发表于 2016-2-16 18:27

巴德的光晕这么感人。。。。。。

ezxxxj 发表于 2016-3-14 12:03

是Baader O3 vs Optolong O3吧,好像打错了哦
页: [1]
查看完整版本: 匈牙利天文摄影师Lóránd Fényes评测Optolong 窄带HO滤镜