牧夫天文网

 找回密码
 加入牧夫(请注明天文爱好者,否则无法通过审核)

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

QHY5III174M打小星系

  [复制链接]
qhyphoto 发表于 2016-4-10 12:02 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式 来自: 北京市 263网络通信股份有限公司

马上注册,结交更多好友,享用更多功能,让你轻松玩转社区。

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?加入牧夫(请注明天文爱好者,否则无法通过审核)

x
本帖最后由 qhyphoto 于 2016-4-10 12:04 编辑

法国天文爱好者Alberic采用QHY5III174M相机打了几个小星系,分享给大家看看。
采用的拍摄手法是短曝光+大量叠加。曝光时间单帧2.5秒,叠加三千张。

设备:Orion Optics 300 mm F/D 5.3  on EQ-6 mount, QHY5III174M


M64-alberic-QHY5III174.jpg


M96-alberic-QHY5III174.jpg
QHY5III174.jpg
华夏星神 发表于 2016-4-10 14:55 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 天津市 电信IDC机房
赞一下
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

peterh 发表于 2016-4-10 17:30 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 江苏省扬州市 电信
短曝多叠的好处及什么情况下适用采用?

点评

这几张照片的作者对短曝多叠的优缺点和具体方法做了一个介绍: Here is a little summary of my technique of short exposures imaging applied to Deep Sky Objects - DSOs. It's a mix between 'Lucky Imaging'  详情 回复 发表于 2016-4-13 00:11
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

急速流星 发表于 2016-4-10 18:27 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 广东省茂名市 电信
很细腻
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

52李伟 发表于 2016-4-10 19:51 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 天津市 电信IDC机房
太牛了!!好细腻啊,细节很好
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| qhyphoto 发表于 2016-4-13 00:11 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 北京市 263网络通信股份有限公司
本帖最后由 qhyphoto 于 2016-4-13 00:13 编辑
peterh 发表于 2016-4-10 17:30
短曝多叠的好处及什么情况下适用采用?

这几张照片的作者对短曝多叠的优缺点和具体方法做了一个介绍:

Here is a little summary of my technique of short exposures imaging applied to Deep Sky
Objects - DSOs. It's a mix between 'Lucky Imaging' technique for planetary objects and
long exposure for Deep Sky Objects.  

                               
登录/注册后可看大图


Main advantages to use short exposures for DSO are :
----------------------------------------------------
- No need of auto-guiding system which may be difficult to calibrate,  不需要自动导星
- No need of super heavy, super expensive or super sturdy mounts,   不需要很贵很重的赤道仪
- A 'planetary setup' is enough,  
- Shorter exposures = less atmospheric disturbance effects on each frame.  减少大气抖动的影响
  So a better resolution can be expected in good or even in medium seeing   可以获得更高的细节和分辨率
  conditions.  

Main drawbacks :
----------------
- Few light compared to long exposure so the limit magnitude is lower than
  traditional long exposure mode. In fact the gap is not as huge as we could
  expect if adding a lot of frames.  

What are the limits of 'short exposure' ?
-----------------------------------------

Good question...

For planetary target, limit is Neptune with an Infra-red filter, let's say
0.5 second in worst case. In most cases, less than 100 ms.

For DSOs, few objects (some bright planetary nebulas, open clusters or glubular
clusters) could be imaged with 100 to 500 ms exposition time with the most recent
sensors.
For galaxies, lower limit exposure time will be 1 second to... 'more'. And 'more' is
quickly limited by mount tracking, atmospheric disturbances, wind and dark current
of the camera when uncooled. For me a realistic value for 'more' is 5 seconds.
So short exposure for DSOs : between 100 ms to 5 sec.

As you can see on my first post, for uncooled IMX 174 which have high dark
current it's better to decrease the upper limit to 3 seconds.   


Frames acquisition :
------------------

First, align correctly your mount as done for long exposure.

I currently use a software for planetary/lunar/solar acquisition like SharpCap 2.8
and when it will be released, Firecapture.  

Use only 16 bit Image format and save as TIFF or PNG.
Use high ain value : 60 - 90. Higher than 90% will give very noisy frames.
Less than 60%, the readout noise will increase.  

To reduce the noise pattern that may appear in background of final image, let the
target move a little bit on the sensor. With the Hand Pad, or if your mount has a
bad Periodic Error curve, it will do the job.


Don't forget to make 'Dark' images after choosen target imaging session, as done
for DSO with long exposure. The more frames, the best.
I don't use Bias nor Flat with IMX174. For bigger size sensors I guess that Flat
will be necessary.  

Processing :
------------

Before registration, I manually sort out the good images from the bad ones.
I don't use automatic sort out. Of course it takes lot of time but I'm
sure it's efficient ! You can use automatic process if you prefer.


For registration, I use Registax 5.0 in monopoint mode ('Aligment Method' : 'Default').
An other solution is Autostakkert 2.6 which have optimisation options to reduce
horizontal noise pattern like IMX 174.

For post-processing I use Iris and Photoshop to adjust the curves and contrast.

Albéric


                               
登录/注册后可看大图





回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

LEEFF 发表于 2016-5-14 17:34 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 广东省中山市 电信
大镜子才出得了这种效果吧
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

本版积分规则

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表