Confirmation confusion...
*************************
Dear All,
This has gotten rather messy, for which I apologize. I see Bo has sent some
messages about a few objects. Let me try and clear this up.
I think that some of his concerns are simply that I have not numbered the comets
in the order in which they are discovered. This is not something I am going to
correct. The SOHO-# is just for record keeping and, unless it is something like
SOHO-1000 or SOHO-2000, it's really not a meaningful number. So I can, and often
do, assign SOHO-# out of order if it is most convenient for me to do so. Thus I
don't want to hear any complaints about numbers that are not in sequence.
Bo does correctly point out that I have confused some reports, and in my own
records of the comets, have matched the wrong positions with the wrong report. I
correct these now.
Here is a response to each comet that appears to have been contested:
(1) SOHO-2414:
I do not know why this one is being mentioned. I see no problem here.
****
(2) SOHO-2424 and SOHO-2425:
I resolved this last week. Per my last posting to the report page:
Soho# Date/Time of Post Discoverer Tel Group Images of..
============================================
2424* Dec18,12 05:06pm S.Liwo C2 Kreutz Dec18,12
2425* Dec18,12 05:46AM B.Zhou C2 Kreutz Dec18,12
--
Just so we're clear, both of these comets were first reported on
SOHOHunter, at the times stated:
SOHO-2424 (Liwo, MSG #4141)
# HEIGHT DATE TIME ANGLE TEL FC COL ROW
7.26 2012/12/18 08:24:05 144.3 C2 10 158.0 22.0
7.15 2012/12/18 08:36:05 143.8 C2 10 159.0 33.0
7.06 2012/12/18 08:48:06 143.5 C2 10 161.0 41.0
6.87 2012/12/18 09:12:09 142.5 C2 10 163.0 60.0
...etc...
SOHO-2425 (Zhou, MSG #4135)
# HEIGHT DATE TIME ANGLE TEL FC COL ROW
7.42 2012/12/18 01:25:51 142.0 C2 10 130.0 26.0
7.32 2012/12/18 01:36:24 141.7 C2 10 133.0 35.0
7.24 2012/12/18 01:48:05 141.3 C2 10 134.0 43.0
7.14 2012/12/18 02:00:05 140.7 C2 10 134.0 54.0
...etc...
Yes, these comets are reported out of order. I don't think that is important.
***
(3) SOHO-2432:
I got two different reports confused with each other and wrote the incorrect
time. This comet was reported Dec26,12 23:48:59 by Z.Xu
# HEIGHT DATE TIME ANGLE TEL FC COL ROW
11.51 2012/12/27 02:42:06 142.9 C3 10 381.0 327.0
11.42 2012/12/27 03:06:05 142.5 C3 10 381.0 329.0
11.11 2012/12/27 03:30:05 141.3 C3 10 381.0 336.0
11.02 2012/12/27 03:42:05 140.9 C3 10 381.0 338.0
10.93 2012/12/27 03:54:05 140.6 C3 10 381.0 340.0
10.60 2012/12/27 04:30:05 139.9 C3 10 383.0 346.0
10.52 2012/12/27 04:42:05 139.9 C3 10 384.0 347.0
10.40 2012/12/27 04:54:05 139.7 C3 10 385.0 349.0
...
7.98 2012/12/27 09:30:05 133.2 C3 10 401.0 393.0
7.86 2012/12/27 09:42:05 132.9 C3 10 402.0 395.0
7.79 2012/12/27 09:54:05 132.3 C3 10 402.0 397.0
7.67 2012/12/27 10:06:05 131.9 C3 10 403.0 399.0
7.59 2012/12/27 10:18:05 131.9 C3 10 404.0 400.0
7.43 2012/12/27 10:30:05 131.2 C3 10 405.0 403.0
7.32 2012/12/27 10:42:06 130.9 C3 10 406.0 405.0
# HEIGHT DATE TIME ANGLE TEL FC COL ROW
7.96 2012/12/27 09:36:05 132.2 C2 11 17.0 67.0
7.85 2012/12/27 09:48:05 131.9 C2 11 22.0 76.0
7.75 2012/12/27 10:00:05 131.4 C2 11 24.0 86.0
7.64 2012/12/27 10:12:05 130.9 C2 11 28.0 96.0
7.52 2012/12/27 10:24:06 130.5 C2 11 33.0 106.0
7.42 2012/12/27 10:36:05 130.2 C2 11 37.0 115.0
...
***
(4) SOHO-2434
Again, I was writing the wrong time for the wrong comet. This is the Dec26,12
23:55:40 report by Z.Xu:
# HEIGHT DATE TIME ANGLE TEL FC COL ROW
9.96 2012/12/27 02:42:06 130.1 C3 10 369.0 376.0
9.84 2012/12/27 03:06:05 129.8 C3 10 370.0 378.0
9.65 2012/12/27 03:18:05 129.5 C3 10 372.0 381.0
9.50 2012/12/27 03:30:05 128.9 C3 10 373.0 384.0
9.43 2012/12/27 03:42:05 128.4 C3 10 373.0 386.0
9.26 2012/12/27 03:54:05 128.8 C3 10 376.0 387.0
9.01 2012/12/27 04:30:05 127.3 C3 10 377.0 393.0
8.90 2012/12/27 04:42:05 127.0 C3 10 378.0 395.0
8.74 2012/12/27 04:54:05 126.8 C3 10 380.0 397.0
...
7.67 2012/12/27 06:42:05 123.0 C3 10 390.0 416.0
7.59 2012/12/27 06:54:05 122.9 C3 10 391.0 417.0
7.43 2012/12/27 07:06:05 122.6 C3 10 393.0 419.0
7.40 2012/12/27 07:18:05 122.2 C3 10 393.0 420.0
7.24 2012/12/27 07:30:05 121.0 C3 10 394.0 424.0
# HEIGHT DATE TIME ANGLE TEL FC COL ROW
6.73 2012/12/27 08:24:06 117.7 C2 11 14.0 254.0
6.61 2012/12/27 08:36:07 117.3 C2 11 21.0 263.0
6.47 2012/12/27 08:48:05 116.6 C2 11 29.0 274.0
***
(5) SOHO-2439
This is the C2 Kreutz Dec27,12 11:13:07 report from B.Zhou
***
(6) SOHO-2440
This was a mistake and was the same as SOHO-2432 above. I will remove it from
the list and reassign the number to something else.
Does anyone else see anything wrong with what I have? I feel I have covered the
December reports several times now, so really don't want to spend more time
doing it unless there's a genuine error.
I will post a summary of these corrections on the Sungrazer site very shortly.
Regards,
Karl
************
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sohohunter/message/4291
Jun 10 2013 17:07:44
So I still don't have December's comets quite correct. If you are
interested in my reasons for the below, please go to the SohoHunter
page and look at my recent message (#4291).
Soho#Date/Time of Post Discoverer Tel Group Images of..
==========================================
2424*Dec18,12 05:06pm S.Liwo C2 KreutzDec18,12
2425*Dec18,12 05:46AM B.Zhou C2 KreutzDec18,12
...
2432 Dec26,12 23:48:59 Z.Xu C3,C2 KreutzDec27,12
...
2434 Dec26,12 23:55:40 Z.Xu C3,C2 KreutzDec27,12
...
2439 Dec27,12 11:13:07 B.Zhou C2 KreutzDec27,12
2440 --> Duplicate of 2432 --> deleted
--
I have not assigned a new comet to SOHO-2440 yet, but I will as soon
as an appropriate candidate appears. (It takes too long to decrease
the later comets by just one number.)
Please email me if something seems wrong here. I have covered these
reports several times now though, and I do not see any more problems.
Regards,
Karl
**************
http://sungrazer.nrl.navy.mil/index.php?p=recent
哎！:D这个KB专家呀！:lol怎么说呢！
2414——这个应该是绝对没有问题的；:P
2424——无论如何都应该是我的才对；
现在，看来专家是死活不认错了啊！……;P
2434——原来第一次公告是对的，后来是他
自己搞乱了，不给我了……再后来改为2439。
呵呵！……大家看，那我现在该怎么办呢？……:(
周波 发表于 2013-6-12 11:17 static/image/common/back.gif
哎！这个KB专家呀！怎么说呢！
2414——这个应该是绝对没有问题的；
2424——无论如何都应该是我的 ...
看了吧，专家没有把编号重新再排序，只是将2440空了出来，让我说，我觉得彗星没多没少这就可以了，编号乱了倒也无所谓。
那么，这回，现在，看来，专家，可就，又……打破，常规，了啊！;P
算了，这几天也难为KB专家了……:lol
目前，他已经把能给我的彗星都给我了，
只是，没有按我说的编号给我而已。:P
Jun 13 2013 11:33:27
February confirmations:
Soho#Date/Time of Post Discoverer Tel Group Images of..
===================================================================
2440Jan12,13 16:08:37 S.Liwo C3 KreutzJan12,13
2452Feb01,13 09:21:46 S.Shurpakov C3 KreutzFeb01-02,13
2453Feb01,13 10:05:29 S.Shurpakov C3 KreutzFeb01,13
2454Feb01,13 14:51:53 S.Liwo C3,C2 NonGrpFeb01-03,13
2456Feb10,13 03:38:15 P.Sun C3 KreutzFeb10,13
2457Feb12,13 03:05:35 Z.Xu C3 KreutzFeb12,13
2458Feb15,13 10:24:44 P.Sun,C.Lin C3 KreutzFeb15-16,13
2459Feb16,13 11:23:52 S.Liwo C3 KreutzFeb16,13
2460Feb19,13 09:33:52 P.Sun C3 KreutzFeb19,13
--
The *new* SOHO-2440 is a fragment that Szymon reported in January. I was
unable to confirm it based on the C3 data, and still am. However, it is
clearly visible in the SECCHI HI-1B images, and so now I CAN confirm it!
(It also nicely takes care of that vacant #2440 slot!)
I was my intent to check SECCHI/HI-1 reports concurrently with the SOHO
reports but we are having some server problems right now so they're going
to have to wait for a bit.
Hopefully all of the above looks reasonable to everyone and I didn't miss
any reports...
Regards,
Karl
************
这是：昨晚专家刚刚发的最新公告。
小孙(705532336) 2013-6-13 23:50:40
等等。。。2455哪去了
徐智坚(785571361) 2013-6-13 23:51:14
小孙(705532336) 2013-6-13 23:51:14
徐智坚(785571361) 2013-6-13 23:51:43
问下where is the 2455?
小孙(705532336) 2013-6-13 23:52:08
佩服的KB五体投地了。。。
周波(271105123)4:57:39
嘿嘿！这专家的公告中若没有错误，那他就不是KB了！
周波(271105123)5:01:17
呵呵！反正这回的公告中没有我的彗星，我也不管了。
昨晚，专家又发了最新的公告……如下：
Jun 13 2013 11:33:27
February confirmations:
Soho#Date/Time of Post Discoverer Tel Group Images of..
===================================================================
2440Jan12,13 16:08:37 S.Liwo C3 KreutzJan12,13
2452Feb01,13 09:21:46 S.Shurpakov C3 KreutzFeb01-02,13
2453Feb01,13 10:05:29 S.Shurpakov C3 KreutzFeb01,13
2454Feb01,13 14:51:53 S.Liwo C3,C2 NonGrpFeb01-03,13
2456Feb10,13 03:38:15 P.Sun C3 KreutzFeb10,13
2457Feb12,13 03:05:35 Z.Xu C3 KreutzFeb12,13
2458Feb15,13 10:24:44 P.Sun,C.Lin C3 KreutzFeb15-16,13
2459Feb16,13 11:23:52 S.Liwo C3 KreutzFeb16,13
2460Feb19,13 09:33:52 P.Sun C3 KreutzFeb19,13
--
The *new* SOHO-2440 is a fragment that Szymon reported in January. I was
unable to confirm it based on the C3 data, and still am. However, it is
clearly visible in the SECCHI HI-1B images, and so now I CAN confirm it!
(It also nicely takes care of that vacant #2440 slot!)
I was my intent to check SECCHI/HI-1 reports concurrently with the SOHO
reports but we are having some server problems right now so they're going
to have to wait for a bit.
Hopefully all of the above looks reasonable to everyone and I didn't miss
any reports...
Regards,
Karl
***********
http://sungrazer.nrl.navy.mil/index.php?p=recent
小孙(705532336) 2013-6-13 23:50:40
等等。。。。
2455哪去了
徐智坚(785571361) 2013-6-13 23:51:14
小孙(705532336) 2013-6-13 23:51:14
徐智坚(785571361) 2013-6-13 23:51:43
问下where is the 2455?
小孙(705532336) 2013-6-13 23:52:08
佩服的KB五体投地了。。。
看来是没吃中午饭饿了
********************
周波(271105123) 4:57:39
嘿嘿！这专家的公告中若没有错误，那他就不是KB了！
周波(271105123) 5:01:17
呵呵！反正这回的公告中没有我的彗星，我也不管了。