Sep 28 2007 17:00:55
Confirmations *** TO Sep 27 2007 13:09:27 ONLY ***:
Soho# Date/Time of Post Discoverer Tel Group Images of..
==========================================
xc62 Aug29,07 10:37:16 B.Zhou C3 Kreutz Aug29,07
1352 Aug31,07 23:10:08 H.Su C2 Kreutz Sep01,07
1353 Sep08,07 10:33:22 H.Su C3,C2 Kreutz Sep08,07
1354 Sep09,07 19:09:34 B.Zhou C3 Kreutz Sep09-10,07
1355 Sep13,07 09:46:25 B.Zhou C3 Kreutz Sep13,07
1356 Sep17,07 09:15:06 A.Kubczak C2 Meyer Sep14-15,07
1357 Sep17,07 10:39:12 B.Zhou C3 Kreutz Sep16,07
1358 Sep24,07 08:58:42 M.Uchina C3,C2 Kreutz Sep23-24,07
1359 Sep26,07 14:52:00 R.Matson C3,C2 Kreutz Sep26-28,07
--
And, of course, we also have
SOHO-85=661 Sep10,07 18:10:41 B.Zhou C2,C3 KrachtII Sep10-12,07 !!
--
Note that Bo's object from Aug29 has to go as an x-comet. The positions
do not line up with Hua's C2 Kreutz. In addition, it is not visible in
HI-1B (which it definitely should be) or COR2 (which is likely for an
object as bright as that should have been). So it can be an x-comet for
now.
--
Going back to P/2007 R5... I have two choices regarding SOHO numbers. I
can either vacate the SOHO-661 spot for the next archvie Kreutz to be
reported, or I can just stick with SOHO-85=661 and leave it at that.
(Note that I am NOT willing to reduce the SOHO comet number of comets
662 through 1359!). I think I will probably vacate 661 and give discovery
credit on the web page to Terry, Kazimieras and Bo. That sound OK to
everyone?
~~KB |