QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

Intes MK67 Delux试镜

[复制链接]
 楼主| actuary616 发表于 2011-7-1 06:54 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 美国
我跟一位同好在cloudynights.com上讨论过MK67和普通5寸APO的比较。下面是他的回答。

I have not looked threw a ES127APO but did have a Skywatcher 120ED Pro and a Intes Micro M603 with 1/8th wave optics. The 120ED did a nice job on wide feild veiws and double star/planetary veiws were very nice, it kept up with the M603 almost on evry target but when you had nights that there was excellent seeing the M603 bested the 120ED on resolving tight doubles and planetary detail. Were the M603 spanked the 120ED bad was lunar but I did end up selling the M603 cause of cool down issues but have since moved to a larger home and keep my current mac in an unheated garage so cool down time is cut more than half during the colder months. You here the term refractor like images used by most mac owners but if you have an excellent sample of a Rumak designed MCT to me the images are just like a refractor except in the star test and thats only by the central obstruction. IMO the MK67 delux is a heck of allot easier to mount and far mor portable and if you dont like the crude rissian crayford focuser I do belive there are aftermarket companies that offer an upgrade. Thats the only dig that I can see with the MK67 plus the rumak design offres a very flat FOV. Good luck and enjoy whichever scope you go for and have fun!
Jim
回复 顶~ 砸~

使用道具 举报

 楼主| actuary616 发表于 2011-7-1 06:57 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 美国
我跟一位同好在cloudynights.com上聊过MK67和普通5寸APO表现上的差异。下面是他的回答:

I have not looked threw a ES127APO but did have a Skywatcher 120ED Pro and a Intes Micro M603 with 1/8th wave optics. The 120ED did a nice job on wide feild veiws and double star/planetary veiws were very nice, it kept up with the M603 almost on evry target but when you had nights that there was excellent seeing the M603 bested the 120ED on resolving tight doubles and planetary detail. Were the M603 spanked the 120ED bad was lunar but I did end up selling the M603 cause of cool down issues but have since moved to a larger home and keep my current mac in an unheated garage so cool down time is cut more than half during the colder months. You here the term refractor like images used by most mac owners but if you have an excellent sample of a Rumak designed MCT to me the images are just like a refractor except in the star test and thats only by the central obstruction. IMO the MK67 delux is a heck of allot easier to mount and far mor portable and if you dont like the crude rissian crayford focuser I do belive there are aftermarket companies that offer an upgrade. Thats the only dig that I can see with the MK67 plus the rumak design offres a very flat FOV. Good luck and enjoy whichever scope you go for and have fun!
Jim
回复 顶~ 砸~

使用道具 举报

easywatch 发表于 2011-7-1 07:19 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 加拿大
顺便提一下,我借的6寸skywatcher已经到了,光轴不正,没法和自己的np101折射比。看了下野鸭星团,也没明显差别。等光轴校正后再比比看!
回复 顶~ 砸~

使用道具 举报

 楼主| actuary616 发表于 2011-7-1 07:26 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 美国
能够AB对比最有说服力。不过其实很难比较MCT和APO,主要是MCT要充分发挥必须具备的充分冷却和良好的视宁度,在实际中很难同时具备。换句话说,马卡很难发挥出全部威力。但是APO一般都能发挥到比较理想的水平,这就是为什么APO很贵,很重,有对台座要求很高,却还有那么多使用者的原因。

回复 顶~ 砸~

使用道具 举报

家猫战斗力 发表于 2011-7-1 12:33 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 中国–北京–北京 中国科学技术信息研究所
学习了                   
回复 顶~ 砸~

使用道具 举报

本版积分规则

APP下載|手机版|爱牧夫天文淘宝店|牧夫天文网 ( 公安备案号21021102000967 )|网站地图|辽ICP备19018387号

GMT+8, 2026-7-30 13:31 , Processed in 0.045573 second(s), 4 queries , Gzip On, Redis On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.5 Licensed

Copyright © 2001-2020, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表