还是google,越来越懒得自己写东东了。
http://bbs.nsysu.edu.tw/txtVersi ... /M.988040699.A.html
> 1. What exactly is BaK4? Is it a type of prism design? A type of
> glass?
It is a type of glass. The main difference is a slightly higher index of
Bak4是指鏡材,非設計.... 折射率較高.and貴一些....
refraction than the less expensive BK7 glass. This means that the prism
will provide "total internal reflection" at steeper angles than with BK7
內部全反設的入射角度比較大,(請想一下高中課程)...
glass. The result is that BK7 prisms will lose some of the light at the
edge of the pupil, but the BaK4 prisms will not.
所以bk7作稜鏡,邊角失光較大,而bak4不會.....
>
> 2. How can you tell if your binocular uses them? I've always thought
> if you examine the exit pupil, a non-BaK4 prism binocular will show a
> "squarish" disk...or more accurately a disk with illumination fall-off
> such that the brightish portion of the exit pupil appears square. Am
> I correct?
Yes, this is correct.
這就表示.bak4稜鏡所作的雙筒,出射光瞳(exit pupil)是正圓,而bk7
'常看出是被外接的方型...大家可拿雙筒出來 遠遠的看目鏡那個exit pupil...
>
> 3. Why ensure such a prism is used or what happens in a non-BaK4
> binocular? Kind of a follow-up to question #2...is it just light
> loss? If so, is it light loss across the entire field of view or just
> at the edges?
The light loss is all across the field of view, but the effect may be
slightly more pronounced (and asymmetric) at the edges of the field.
邊角失光還繞使視野四周,但蠻明顯不對稱...
>
> 4. Are roof prism binoculars subject to this problem in any way?
>
Yes, they are. But in a roof prism of the type used in binoculars, one of
the surfaces won't support total internal reflection at all and is
silvered. For a very good coating, this gives about 10% less reflection
than a total internal reflection, so the image won't be quite as bright
anyway. If you want the absolute brightest image, you will get a porro
prism design.
屋頂稜鏡式..(H型雙筒)有一面沒有全反射..LOSS約10%的光...所以反兒沒有
 ORRO PRISM BINOCULAR亮
Grieg
(譯的不好,請不吝修正) |