1800/1600 = 1.125
Scientific community or ordinary scientists who possess the very basic logical thinking will consider that the increase of 12.5% in global methane concentration in the Earth’s atmosphere within about 20 years is quite significant. Specialists in different sub-fields will examine its various causes or consequences in radiation, circulation, photochemistry, biochemistry, geochemistry, etc., which, I believe, is what has been happening in scientific community in the last few decades or so.
On the other hand, I do not think anyone who, after knowing this fact, still regards this as “甲烷在大气中浓度持续增长是一个由来已久的假象” or “关于2ppm事情,无论是否可以理解为1.6ppm的一种简写,至少与1800ppb相差不大” is qualified to do scientific research. In other words, I do not think an ordinary scientist needs to pay any attention to theories or hypotheses proposed by people like you who have such a big 差距在于对于这些信息的理解 from an ordinary scientist.
It is not whether you or an ordinary scientist is right or wrong on a specific theory or hypothesis. It is that, at least from this incident as one can see, you do not have an ability to think logically. |