作者是著名的Tom Trusock,网址:http://www.cloudynights.com/item.php?item_id=1706
节选了一些,翻译了一下:
...Intane Optics offered up what easily turned out to be the worst of the bunch.The mechanics on this scope are so bad, it’s pitiful.
英田提供的产品很轻易的成为了4个样品中最次的,机械做工如此之差,真是可怜。
...you have to wonder if the designers have ever actually been near a working refractor. ...
你会好奇这个设计者是否真的靠近过一个可以工作的折射镜。
I'd like to note that they did include a handy cosmetic brush. I suspect it was intended for cleaning optics, but in years
of doing this, I've never seen anything quite like that included with a telescope....
我要指出,镜子还附送一个方便的化妆刷。我有点怀疑这是否是用作清洁镜片的,但是这些年来,我还从来没有看到镜子会附送这个刷子的。
First off, the coma due to miscollimation was so horrid it was hard to even make out best focus. It looked like the scope
suffered from severe astigmatism. I tried to get a look at the diffraction patterns to look for LSA, but I couldn't do it.
Between the floppy ota, and the mount attachment which constantly wanted to loosen itself I just couldn't aim the thing with any degree of precision at low powers, let alone at the magnifications required for star testing .
首先,镜子的慧差(由于光轴不正)如此严重,以至于很难精确合焦。另外,astigmatism也很严重。我试图观察衍射环来寻找LSA,但我做不到。软弱的OTA和总是企图脱落的架台连接器让我在低倍率下都难以精确瞄准,更别提做恒星测试的高倍率了。
Frankly, this unit was so bad, and the problems so blindingly obvious, I simply had to ask the company why they ordered this sample.
老实说,这个镜子太糟了,问题太乍眼,我只能去问公司为何他们要订这个样品。
。。。。
。。。
[ 本帖最后由 leexeen 于 2007-10-9 21:24 编辑 ] |
|